Heads Up, Ears Down

This blog accurately identifies depictions of violence and cruelty toward animals in films. The purpose is to provide viewers with a reliable guide so that such depictions do not come as unwelcome surprises. Films will be accurately notated, providing a time cue for each incident along with a concise description of the scene and perhaps relevant context surrounding the incident. In order to serve as a useful reference tool, films having no depictions of violence to animals will be included, with an indication that there are no such scenes. This is confirmation that the films have been watched with the stated purpose in mind.


Note that the word depictions figures prominently in the objective. It is a travesty that discussions about cruelty in film usually are derailed by the largely unrelated assertion that no animals really were hurt (true only in some films, dependent upon many factors), and that all this concern is just over a simulation. Not the point, whether true or false. We do not smugly dismiss depictions of five-year-olds being raped because those scenes are only simulations. No, we are appalled that such images are even staged, and we are appropriately horrified that the notion now has been planted into the minds of the weak and cruel.


Depictions of violence or harm to animals are assessed in keeping with our dominant culture, with physical abuse, harmful neglect, and similar mistreatment serving as a base line. This blog does not address extended issues of animal welfare, and as such does not identify scenes of people eating meat or mules pulling plows. The goal is to itemize images that might cause a disturbance in a compassionate household.


These notes provide a heads-up but do not necessarily discourage watching a film because of depicted cruelty. Consuming a piece of art does not make you a supporter of the ideas presented. Your ethical self is created by your public rhetoric and your private actions, not by your willingness to sit through a filmed act of violence.

Land of Milk and Honey

Land of Milk and Honey (Pays de cocagne). Pierre Étaix, 1971.
😸
Edition screened: Included in Criterion 2-Blu-ray set # 655 Pierre Étaix, released 2013. French language with English subtitles. Runtime approximately 76 minutes.

Summary: No particular depictions of violence toward animals.

This last film by Étaix is difficult to sit through. All the charming wit of the early films has been swept away in this hostile rehash of the themes from 1966’s As Long as You've Got Your Health. Etaix recycles the structural glue of vacation campsite abominations from Feeling Good to string together unflattering snippets of French folks’ fat asses, horrible singing, inarticulate pontifications, and general poor taste. My viewing of Land of Milk and Honey caused recall of two other films. First, and in unflattering contrast, Agnès Varda’s captivating 1958 documentary about Riviera vacationers, Du Côté de la Côte, overflowing with visual wit and beautiful cinematography. Second, and in unflattering similarity, Stanley Kramer’s 1963 tribute to toe-tagged comedians It’s a Tedious, Plodding, Tiresome, Can We Please Turn This Off World, overflowing with failed humor and embarrassing death rattles.

at
Labels: , , , ,