Heads Up, Ears Down

This blog accurately identifies depictions of violence and cruelty toward animals in films. The purpose is to provide viewers with a reliable guide so that such depictions do not come as unwelcome surprises. Films will be accurately notated, providing a time cue for each incident along with a concise description of the scene and perhaps relevant context surrounding the incident. In order to serve as a useful reference tool, films having no depictions of violence to animals will be included, with an indication that there are no such scenes. This is confirmation that the films have been watched with the stated purpose in mind.


Note that the word depictions figures prominently in the objective. It is a travesty that discussions about cruelty in film usually are derailed by the largely unrelated assertion that no animals really were hurt (true only in some films, dependent upon many factors), and that all this concern is just over a simulation. Not the point, whether true or false. We do not smugly dismiss depictions of five-year-olds being raped because those scenes are only simulations. No, we are appalled that such images are even staged, and we are appropriately horrified that the notion now has been planted into the minds of the weak and cruel.


Depictions of violence or harm to animals are assessed in keeping with our dominant culture, with physical abuse, harmful neglect, and similar mistreatment serving as a base line. This blog does not address extended issues of animal welfare, and as such does not identify scenes of people eating meat or mules pulling plows. The goal is to itemize images that might cause a disturbance in a compassionate household.


These notes provide a heads-up but do not necessarily discourage watching a film because of depicted cruelty. Consuming a piece of art does not make you a supporter of the ideas presented. Your ethical self is created by your public rhetoric and your private actions, not by your willingness to sit through a filmed act of violence.

The Believers

The Believers. John Schlesinger, 1987.
😿😿
Edition screened: MGM DVD, released 2002. English language. Runtime approximately 114 minutes.

Summary: Animal mutilation.

Details: I no longer have this VoosploiDootation title to rescreen, but recall a ritualistically murdered and decapitated cat found in a city park near the beginning of the film, and a crucified cat in Haiti around the middle. Of course.

I often like creepy occult intrigues, but was disappointed in this. It seemed like a film version of the creative writing exercise where a famous work is changed, one element at a time, until there is a new work. In this case, thematic elements from Rosemary’s Baby including fascination with a new home, concern for a besieged child, and the exposure of a villainous old couple remained intact while the plot changed around them. l know several old couples who often think the plot is changing around them.


at
Labels: