Heads Up, Ears Down

This blog accurately identifies depictions of violence and cruelty toward animals in films. The purpose is to provide viewers with a reliable guide so that such depictions do not come as unwelcome surprises. Films will be accurately notated, providing a time cue for each incident along with a concise description of the scene and perhaps relevant context surrounding the incident. In order to serve as a useful reference tool, films having no depictions of violence to animals will be included, with an indication that there are no such scenes. This is confirmation that the films have been watched with the stated purpose in mind.


Note that the word depictions figures prominently in the objective. It is a travesty that discussions about cruelty in film usually are derailed by the largely unrelated assertion that no animals really were hurt (true only in some films, dependent upon many factors), and that all this concern is just over a simulation. Not the point, whether true or false. We do not smugly dismiss depictions of five-year-olds being raped because those scenes are only simulations. No, we are appalled that such images are even staged, and we are appropriately horrified that the notion now has been planted into the minds of the weak and cruel.


Depictions of violence or harm to animals are assessed in keeping with our dominant culture, with physical abuse, harmful neglect, and similar mistreatment serving as a base line. This blog does not address extended issues of animal welfare, and as such does not identify scenes of people eating meat or mules pulling plows. The goal is to itemize images that might cause a disturbance in a compassionate household.


These notes provide a heads-up but do not necessarily discourage watching a film because of depicted cruelty. Consuming a piece of art does not make you a supporter of the ideas presented. Your ethical self is created by your public rhetoric and your private actions, not by your willingness to sit through a filmed act of violence.

The Flowers of St. Francis

The Flowers of St. Francis (Francesco, giullare di Dio). Roberto Rossellini, 1950.
😿
Edition screened: Criterion DVD #293, released 2005. Italian language with English subtitles. Runtime approximately 87 minutes.

Summary: Much discussion of cutting off a pig’s foot, and the subsequent dumping of the pig’s body by a campfire.

Details:
The film consists of chapters that are individual stories of St. Francis and the other friars in his camp. The chapter entitled “A Pig’s Foot” (33:22 - 40:26) tells how Brother Ginepro misunderstands a friar's request for a pig's foot to eat and cuts the foot off a live pig. The herdsman finds his mutilated pig and brings the dead animal to the friars in disgusted charity.

While we do not see any dismembering, discussion of cutting off the animal's foot runs throughout. When Brother Ginepro finds the Donor Pig he follows it behind bushes, and we see the bushes shake a bit while a pig screams in distress. Ginepro emerges with a clean pig's foot obviously from a butcher's shop rather than the bloody mess that would have been hacked from a living animal with an inadequate knife. The chapter ends with the herdsman dumping a carcass with one amputated leg at the friar's campfire.

at
Labels: , ,