Heads Up, Ears Down

This blog accurately identifies depictions of violence and cruelty toward animals in films. The purpose is to provide viewers with a reliable guide so that such depictions do not come as unwelcome surprises. Films will be accurately notated, providing a time cue for each incident along with a concise description of the scene and perhaps relevant context surrounding the incident. In order to serve as a useful reference tool, films having no depictions of violence to animals will be included, with an indication that there are no such scenes. This is confirmation that the films have been watched with the stated purpose in mind.


Note that the word depictions figures prominently in the objective. It is a travesty that discussions about cruelty in film usually are derailed by the largely unrelated assertion that no animals really were hurt (true only in some films, dependent upon many factors), and that all this concern is just over a simulation. Not the point, whether true or false. We do not smugly dismiss depictions of five-year-olds being raped because those scenes are only simulations. No, we are appalled that such images are even staged, and we are appropriately horrified that the notion now has been planted into the minds of the weak and cruel.


Depictions of violence or harm to animals are assessed in keeping with our dominant culture, with physical abuse, harmful neglect, and similar mistreatment serving as a base line. This blog does not address extended issues of animal welfare, and as such does not identify scenes of people eating meat or mules pulling plows. The goal is to itemize images that might cause a disturbance in a compassionate household.


These notes provide a heads-up but do not necessarily discourage watching a film because of depicted cruelty. Consuming a piece of art does not make you a supporter of the ideas presented. Your ethical self is created by your public rhetoric and your private actions, not by your willingness to sit through a filmed act of violence.

The Brothers Grimm

The Brothers Grimm. Terry Gilliam, 2005.
😿😿😿
Edition screened: Miramax DVD, released 2005. English language. Runtime approximately 118 minutes.

Summary: Particularly offensive depictions for mistaken comedic effect.

Details:
1) A pile of vipers seeking only to escape is hacked to pieces with a sword, 7:50-7:57.
2) A rabbit hanging by its feet is skinned and gutted, 29:04-29:42. This seems to go on forever, is extremely graphic, and meant to be funny. Hey, get this: The dude with the sword who is like some witch hunter or something? He’s like totally grossed out by this hot babe gutting this rabbit. You had to see it.
3) Another jackass in the same hut appears to throw a dagger into a living rabbit, immediately revealed to be just a fur or carcass hanging on the wall, 29:44.
4) Dialogue with the yuck-it-up rabbit corpse hanging in the middle-ground continues through 30:35.
5) A man bragging to be afraid of nothing is startled by a kitten, and kicks it into a torture device designed like a garlic chopper. Blood flies everywhere, including onto Terry Gilliam’s gelatinous thigh which he slaps in hilarity as he explains the irony and gut-splitting humor of all this in some bonus feature.


at
Labels: